html role=main


It’s a shame, because I really like that you can just drop these boolean attributes into an element and they’re true because they’re there. Inside main I use an article for a single page/post OR a section of articles for blog/archive pages.

Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. For the great HTML vs XHTML closing slashes/talisman debate, check out Dr Bruce’s article HTML 5 + XML = XHTML 5.

body The definition of main proposed by Ian does not identify the main content of the document, so cannot be used as a programmatic indicator of the main content of the document or indeed as the main content of anything.

Having read through the bug thread Hixie links to, I can’t help feeling that the WHATWG definition is liable to create a mismatch between web author expectations and AT user expectations. Regarding images and image galleries, what would be the most proper way to display a set of images and captions on a page if those images are the primary content? It’s the same as saying identifies the main content of the document. @all — yup was a typo. (when used = 101 @Christian – I’ve fixed a few typo’s, are there any I’ve not got? I’m also happy with the actual spec (a unique element). developers are still wrong about the use of the HTML5, mainly on issues related to . I would be inclined to go by the w3c, no? the WHATWG definition is liable to create a mismatch between web author expectations and AT user expectations. That’s just… ugly.
One thing screen reader users can’t do is determine where the principal content of the page starts/ends. Taking snapshots, is likely to result in incorrect assessment or over the top backend coding. Your boss’s car breaks down, and he wants it repaired. The content of a

element should be unique to the document. BUT, also inside main, I like to have my sidebar(s), because, in my eyes, they are also main content in the sense that they are not header/footer nor should they be the same level as header/main/footer. You’ve got a fantastic resource here for html5 markup. for your recasting of main, to date there has been no reply. Can you share some data with us to illustrate the basis for your assumptions? The proposal was accepted in November 2012, and
was then rolled into the HTML5.1 specification. If it is used in ordinary HTML5 (served as “text/html”) the second option is equal to ” is correct? article If the
element didn’t represent its children, then it would be like if it was set to display:none.

Since the
element is now included in the HTML specification, the element has reverted to its HTML4 definition: The body element represents the content of the document. Elements in the DOM represent things; that is, they have intrinsic meaning, also known as semantics.

Would that be semantic or keep using div as the page wrapper. Learn more. so, arguably, since it allows for the user to skip past inner bits of the content that aren’t “main” content (I’ve often seen articles have “skip to next

Sure HTML can describe much more than a “pretty picture” page for someone’s website, but ideas like for instance, doing the cardinal sin of using tables for layout, sure its “bad” practice and not what tables are meant for but people know how to use them to keep things lined up without having to do all that CSS styling (and still maybe having it look wrong). required="" And is also contradictory to another HTML5 doctor post, http://html5doctor.com/the-article-element/. You’re welcome to your opinion of how best to help authors use the element, but please don’t just lie about what other specs say.

This seems quite common in WordPress themes. From looking at publicly available data sets I am not seeing the markup patterns you describe being used for the purpose you describe.



If you’re looking for a page wrapper element (for any flavour of HTML or XHTML), consider applying styles directly to the element as described by Kroc Camen. You can always update your selection by clicking Cookie Preferences at the bottom of the page. I even put an additional query of html5.js from google in my but ie8 doesn’t recognize any styles on my
tag. At least in the case of nav, both specs advise using it only for major blocks of navigation. Ex.

but I think it failed in every other respect and I hope many of the more useless elements become deprecated in the inevitable HTML6. – main (correct XHTML) Alice, main isn’t sectioning content, so it doesn’t make sense to add it to that flowchart. Copyright © 2020 HTML5 Doctor. “@Léonie The main element is distinct from the section and article elements in that the main element does not contribute to the document outline. which will only match a main element with a role attribute set to main. – header While it isn’t really a mistake, I believe it’s best practice to avoid this pattern.
. The main content area consists of content that is directly related to or expands upon the central topic of a document, or the central functionality of an application.

Ian is a major contributor to HTML but does not have the last word on the specification of HTML, which is understandably frustrating for him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *