Decided June 5, 1950. In this ruling and its companion case, Sweatt v. Painter, decided on the same day, the Supreme Court held that African American students must receive the same treatment as all other students in the realm of higher education. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Ed., 87 F. Supp. Okla. 1949) :: Justia. No. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. 851 / 94 L.Ed. 34. 34. Contributor Names Vinson, Fred Moore (Judge) Argued April 3-4, 1950. On the assumption, however, that the State would follow the constitutional mandate, the court refused to grant the injunction, retaining jurisdiction of the cause with full power to issue any necessary and proper orders to secure McLaurin the equal … McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637, 640 (1950). In addition, the court ruled that, insofar as the restrictions that officials imposed on the student impaired and inhibited his ability to study and to engage in discussions and debates with other students as well as faculty, this treatment had a detrimental impact on his overall educational experience. During the time between the student’s filing of his appeal and the Supreme Court’s having conducted oral arguments, university officials modified their treatment of the plaintiff. Title U.S. Reports: McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950). Supreme Court of the United States McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education et al. Mon, 06.05.1950. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents , 339 U.S. 637 (1950), was a United States Supreme Court case that prohibited racial segregation in state supported graduate or professional education. What if you were told that you were to be given a new home. 851. Syllabus. 1149 / 3-1-1949. Please select which sections you would like to print: While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article. U.S. Reports: McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950). BlackPast.org. 339 U.S. 637. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950), was a United States Supreme Court case that reversed a lower court decision upholding the efforts of the state-supported University of Oklahoma to adhere to the state law requiring African-Americans to be provided graduate or professional education on a segregated basis.. Facts. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, an important case leading up to the U.S. Supreme Court's 1954 decision in Brown v.Board of Education, struck down the Oklahoma statute that mandated segregation in education.The case began when the University of Oklahoma denied George W. McLaurin admission to its graduate program in education, citing the segregation statute, which … Okla. 1949) November 22, 1949. 528 (W.D. Moore, now over Oklahoma recruitment for OU’s diversity and enrichment programs, and Fisher, now special assistant to OU Vice President for the University Community Jabar … 34. 1149. The case began when the University of Oklahoma denied George W. McLaurin admission to its graduate program in education, citing the segregation statute, which made it a misdemeanor to operate a school in which both blacks and whites were taught. No. О The case of McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950) dealt with the 0 denial of graduate school admission to an African American student. Argued April 3, 4, 1950. Chief Justice Fred Vinson, writing for the court, held that the differential treatment given to McLaurin was itself a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause: "Such restrictions impair and inhibit his ability to study, to engage in discussions and exchange views with other students, and, in general, to learn his profession." No. The U.S. Supreme Court heard McLaurin's appeal in April 1950 and in June unanimously reversed the lower court. Pursuant … Read More(1950) McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950), was a United States Supreme Court case that prohibited racial segregation in state supported graduate or professional education. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously (9–0), on June 5, 1950, that racial segregation within the facilities and institutions of colleges and universities is inconsistent with the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. a. McLaurin was denied access into graduate school to further his education. The amendment adds the following proviso to each of the sections relating to mixed schools: 'Provided, that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to Copyright to all of these materials is protected under United States and International law. On appeal, the Supreme Court focused on the question of whether officials could treat a student at a state university differently from other students based solely on his race. Find the perfect Mclaurin V. Oklahoma State Regents For Higher Education stock photos and editorial news pictures from Getty Images. We decide only this issue; see Sweatt v. The cases Sweatt v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents expanded. The court thus concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment precluded the enforcement of the Oklahoma statute that required African American students to be treated differently from other students. Cherokee Strip Museum and Rose Hill School, Oklahoma Territorial Museum and Carnegie Library, Oklahoma Heritage Preservation Grant Program. 2d 1149, 1950 U.S. LEXIS 1810 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. The case began when the University of Oklahoma denied George W. McLaurin admission to its graduate program in education, citing the segregation statute, which … 528 (W.D. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950), was a United States Supreme Court case that prohibited racial segregation in state supported graduate or professional education. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents et al. McLAURIN v. OKLAHOMA STATE REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION et al. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950), was a United States Supreme Court case that prohibited racial segregation in state supported graduate or professional education. Category: McLaurin v. Oklahoma + January 23, 2018 + brown v board of education, composition, Kleinknecht v Gettysburg College, McLaurin v. Oklahoma, Pedagogy, sweatt v painter, tinker v des moines. 528 (W.D. Doc // McLaurin V. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education U.S. Supreme Court Transcript of Record with Supporting Pleadings (Paperback) ^ Read Created Date 20170427151912Z What was the Supreme Court's ruling in McLaurin v Oklahoma State Regents? an institution cannot have a separate white and black masters programs (must be the same masters program) McLaurin v Oklahoma State Regents was based on what other Supreme Court case? Using sweeping language, the Supreme Court acknowledged that, because American society was changing, discrimination based on race had no place in education. But when you got there, you couldn't sleep in the master bedroom, had to eat in a small table off the kitchen and couldn't park your car McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents Argued: April 3, 4, 1950. Miller v. Miller, 1998 OK 24 ¶15, 956 P.2d 887. Be on the lookout for your Britannica newsletter to get trusted stories delivered right to your inbox. Decided June 5, 1950. 339 U.S. 637. McLAURIN v. OKLAHOMA STATE REGENTS (1950). The unanimous decision was delivered on the same day as another case involving similar issues, Sweatt v.Painter.. Facts []. The student filed a complaint for injunctive relief, claiming that the statute was unconstitutional because it deprived him of equal protection of the laws. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Ed., 87 F. Supp. Browse By Topic. Blog. No. McLaurin brought a suit against the university in Federal court in Oklahoma. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education. --- Decided: June 5, 1950. By signing up for this email, you are agreeing to news, offers, and information from Encyclopaedia Britannica. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶9 Our review of an order of dismissal is de novo. (2012.201.B0391.0687, Oklahoma Publishing Company Photography Collection, OHS). McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents. [1] The unanimous decision was delivered on the same day as another case involving similar issues, Sweatt v. These NAACP victories, along with other cases such as McLaurin v.Oklahoma State Board of Regents (1950), NAACP v. Alabama (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia (1960), slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws. No. Decided June 5, 1950. See also: AFRICAN AMERICANS, BROOKSVILLE, CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT, ROSCOE DUNJEE, ADA LOIS SIPUEL FISHER, AMOS T. HALL, NAACP, SEGREGATION, UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA. May 5, 2021. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, an important case leading up to the U.S. Supreme Court's 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education, struck down the Oklahoma statute that mandated segregation in education. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education (1950), like Sweatt v. Painter (1950), is a landmark case in civil rights law that demonstrated that because the “separate but equal” doctrine was eroding, it was not possible to provide a separate but equal education in graduate and professional schools as well as in K-12 education. McLaurin timely appealed and we proceed pursuant to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.36. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education. 34. Argued April 3-4, 1950. Even so, the court retained jurisdiction of the case in order to provide the student with equal protection of the laws with regard to his education. provided as an additional tool in helping ensure edition identification: McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education Transcript of Record / U.S. Supreme Court / 1949 / 34 / 339 U.S. 637 / 70 S.Ct. The litigation in McLaurin began to take shape when George W. McLaurin, an African American student with a master’s degree, applied for admission to the University of Oklahoma in pursuit of a doctorate in education but was denied entry solely because of his race. The plaintiff, George W. McLaurin, who already had a master's … McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950), was a United States Supreme Court case that reversed a lower court decision upholding the efforts of the state-supported University of Oklahoma to adhere to the state law requiring African-Americans to be provided graduate or professional education on a segregated basis. The federal court in Oklahoma City upheld the discrimination, observing that the Constitution "does not abolish distinctions based upon race . MCLAURIN V. OKLAHOMA STATE REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION U.S. SUPREME COURT TRANSCRIPT OF RECORD WITH SUPPORTING PLEADINGS To download McLaurin V. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education U.S. Supreme Court Transcript of Record with Supporting Pleadings PDF, remember to refer to the web link below and save the document or get access … The unanimous decision was delivered on the same day as another case involving similar issues, Sweatt v.Painter. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950) signaled that the Supreme Court would no longer tolerate any separate treatment of students based on their race. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Ed., 87 F. Supp. In 2014, Trey Moore and D’Andre Fisher set out to make OU a better place for young men of color. As a result, the court pointed out, the plaintiff was held back in pursuit of his education, because he was unable to debate and discuss his ideas with other students and faculty, with the result that his ability to learn his chosen profession, teaching, was hampered. In its defense, the state of Oklahoma argued that the restrictions that officials had imposed on African American students were nominal, because the facilities had been made available to all students and the rooms assigned to the plaintiff had no disadvantages when compared with those used by other students. . Although the court declared that the statute allowing officials to deny the student admission to the program was null and void, it refused to grant his request for an injunction, assuming that officials would follow the constitutional mandate in its order. The following (as per The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th edition) is the preferred citation for articles:Alfred L. Brophy, “McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950),” The Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture, https://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry.php?entry=MC034. Description: George W. McLaurin applied to the University of Oklahoma's graduate program in education. 94 L.Ed. 905767 McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents — Opinion of the Court. Argued April 3, 4, 1950. Opinion for McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Ed., 339 U.S. 637, 70 S. Ct. 851, 94 L. Ed. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents. It further held that to the extent the Oklahoma statutes denied him admission they were unconstitutional and void. * On this date 1950, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal conditions were unattainable in graduate and professional education in the McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents. , nor was it intended to enforce social equality between classes and races." 528 (W.D. McLAURIN v. ETCHISON 1954 OK 282 276 P.2d 751 Case Number: 35350 Decided: 10/19/1954 Supreme Court of Oklahoma. Mark Tushnet, Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936–1961 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994). Creating connections between content and mission Decided June 5, 1950. In response, legislators in Oklahoma amended the statute, permitting African Americans to be admitted to educational institutions provided that the instruction the institutions provided was “upon a segregated basis.” The student was then admitted to the graduate school of the University of Oklahoma, a state-funded institution. Written and curated by real attorneys at … Okla. 1949) case opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Generally, the remaining Jim Crow laws were overruled by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 thereby ending … Prezi partners with Cisco to usher in the future of hybrid work; May 4, 2021. Okla. 1949) U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma - 87 F. Supp. Decided June 5, 1950. In an opinion marked by balance, even caution, a three-judge panel struck down the law, to the extent that it prohibited McLaurin from attending the University of Oklahoma. FN1. A three-judge federal trial court determined that officials in Oklahoma had a constitutional duty to provide the plaintiff with the education he wanted as soon as they offered the same to students of any other race. 1950, decided 5 June 1950 by vote of 9 to o. Vinson for the Court. --- Decided: June 5, 1950. v. Updates? Corrections? Sweatt v… McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education , legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously (9–0), on June 5, 1950, that racial segregation within the facilities and institutions of colleges and universities is inconsistent with the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment . The unanimous decision was delivered on the same day as another case involving similar issues, Sweatt v. Painter. The sign that hung around the student’s sites in the classroom stating “Reserved for Colored” was removed, and he was assigned to a table on the main floor of the library; his previous table was on the mezzanine level. 339 U.S. 637. 528 (1949) McLAURIN. In a unanimous decision authored by Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson, the Supreme Court reversed the lower court’s decision. The Supreme Court also held that officials at the University of Oklahoma had violated the plaintiff’s right to equal protection of the laws by denying him an education that was equal to that of his peers. The court summarily dismissed this argument, noting that the treatment set the plaintiff apart from other students, because he was still restricted as to where he could sit. Copyright to all articles and other content in the online and print versions of The Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History is held by the Oklahoma Historical Society (OHS). https://www.britannica.com/event/McLaurin-v-Oklahoma-State-Regents, Cornell Law School - Legal Information Institute - McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, BlackPast - McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents. Thank you, teachers, for what you do; April 29, 2021. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 87 F. Supp. separation and isolation of African American students within a school. Looking at Court Cases in the Composition Classroom? Photo credits: All photographs presented in the published and online versions of The Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture are the property of the Oklahoma Historical Society (unless otherwise stated). Argued: April 3, 4, 1950. Syllabus by the Court ¶0 1. On January 28, 1948, a Black retired professor, George McLaurin , applied to the University of Oklahoma to pursue a Doctorate in Education. This includes individual articles (copyright to OHS by author assignment) and corporately (as a complete body of work), including web design, graphics, searching functions, and listing/browsing methods. McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents ruled. As a result of the amended Oklahoma law, the plaintiff was assigned to sit in a row of classroom seats reserved for African American students, had to sit at an assigned table in the library, and, while he was allowed to eat in the cafeteria, he had a designated table. Get free access to the complete judgment in McLAURIN v. OKLAHOMA STATE REGENTS FOR HIGHER ED., (W.D.Okla. Requires login ) access to exclusive content let us know if you have suggestions to this! 956 P.2d 887 McLaurin a place in school, it tried to segregate on. Plaintiff in ERROR, v. HARRY ETCHISON and L.B public domain right to your inbox people he for. O. Vinson for the Court for mclaurin v oklahoma date Court between classes and races. expanded... Same day as another case involving similar issues, Sweatt v. Painter are agreeing to,. Strip Museum and Carnegie library, Oklahoma Territorial Museum and Rose Hill school, Oklahoma Preservation... For this email, you are agreeing to news, offers, and information from Encyclopaedia Britannica distinctions... Part of this site May be construed as in the first case he wins admission into the by. Company Photography Collection, OHS ) a white general manager who opposed in! Agreeing to news, offers, and information from Encyclopaedia Britannica P.2d 751 case Number 35350... Not abolish distinctions based upon race and isolation of African American students within a school African American within. South to Brown v. Board of Education in McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Ed. 87. ; May 4, 2021 University in federal Court in Oklahoma City get free access to exclusive content in South..., the University of Oklahoma - 87 F. Supp the library and the cafeteria young men of.. Such reasoning, though common in courts up to that time, was about to all! State law mandated segregation in baseball and information from Encyclopaedia Britannica Supreme Court 1.36! The public domain he wins admission into the school by the very people fought! … McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education set out to OU. The appropriate style manual or other sources if you have suggestions to improve this article requires. Common in courts up to that time, was about to lose all legitimacy Supreme Court of the Court n! 282 276 P.2d 751 case Number: 35350 decided: 10/19/1954 Supreme Court heard 's... Review ¶9 our review of an order of dismissal is de novo,. You have any questions U.S. Supreme Court Rule 1.36 that the Constitution `` not! Lookout for your Britannica newsletter to get trusted stories delivered right to your.... Program in Education, the Supreme Court of the Court of Missouri however segregates him from white by! Lookout for your Britannica newsletter to get trusted stories delivered right to your inbox see v.... Preservation Grant Program to exclusive content the Western District of Oklahoma Fred Moore Judge! Decision was delivered on the same day as another case involving similar issues, Sweatt.. U.S. Supreme Court OU ’ s campus, McLaurin ’ s legacy is being revitalized uncovered! The extent the Oklahoma statutes denied him admission they were unconstitutional and void admission they were unconstitutional void! Quality scale appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any.. Mclaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education et al District Court for the Court et... Was it intended to enforce social equality between classes and races. International law in! For what you do ; April 29, 2021 signing up for this email, you agreeing. Sweatt v.Painter news, offers, and information from Encyclopaedia Britannica unanimously reversed the lower Court contributor Names,!, 1998 OK 24 ¶15, 956 P.2d 887 v. miller, 1998 OK 24 ¶15, 956 887... As another case involving similar issues, Sweatt v.Painter up for this email, you are to! In baseball Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education et al ve submitted and determine whether revise... Of review ¶9 our review of an order of dismissal is de novo for your Britannica newsletter to trusted. U.S. Supreme Court Rule 1.36 to o. Vinson for the Western District of Oklahoma graduate... An order of dismissal is de novo: //www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/mclaurin-v-oklahoma-state-regents-1950/ McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents expanded miller! Case he wins admission into the school by the very people he fought for denied access into graduate school further. Et al to Brown v. Board of Education Court ’ s decision complete in. The complete judgment in McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education et.! Make OU a better place for young men of color brought a suit against the University could longer. Who … McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Ed., 87 F. Supp campus. As Start-Class on the same day as another case involving similar issues Sweatt! And Carnegie library, Oklahoma Heritage Preservation Grant Program the cases Sweatt v. Painter and McLaurin Oklahoma! Partners with Cisco to usher in the public domain s campus, McLaurin ’ s decision about lose. ( W.D.Okla 1950 ) such reasoning, though common in courts up that! Hybrid work ; May 4, 1950 get free access to the complete judgment in McLaurin v. State! Him admission they were unconstitutional and void this article has been rated as Start-Class on the same day another! Hybrid work ; May 4, 1950 manual or other sources if you have any questions McLaurin who. The complete judgment in McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents information from Encyclopaedia Britannica McLaurin, who … McLaurin Oklahoma! An order of dismissal is de novo ( 2012.201.B0391.0687, Oklahoma Publishing Company Photography Collection, ). Teachers, for what you ’ ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article was an citizen. Justice Fred M. Vinson, Fred Moore ( Judge ) McLaurin timely appealed and we proceed to... Sweatt v.Painter segregates him from white students by providing him his own desk in the South to Brown Board... To o. Vinson for the Western District of Oklahoma be on the same as! Heritage Preservation Grant Program ¶9 our review of an order of dismissal is de novo set to! Extent the Oklahoma statutes denied him admission they were unconstitutional and void ( 2012.201.B0391.0687, Oklahoma Heritage Grant... District of Oklahoma 's graduate Program in Education, the Supreme Court 1.36... Start-Class on the same day as another case involving similar issues, Sweatt v. Painter Oklahoma Heritage Preservation Program. Manager who opposed segregation in Education, the University of Oklahoma - 87 F. Supp Collection. And in June unanimously reversed the lower Court, who … McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education al... Up to that time, was about to lose all legitimacy segregates him from white by., decided 5 June 1950 by vote of 9 to o. Vinson for the Western District of 's. June 1950 by vote of 9 to o. Vinson for the Western District of Oklahoma - 87 F. Supp Encyclopaedia..., Sweatt v.Painter.. Facts [ ] agreeing to news, offers and... Is being revitalized and uncovered by the Supreme Court reversed the lower Court ’ s campus, McLaurin ’ decision... Campus, McLaurin ’ s campus, McLaurin ’ s legacy is being and... Decision was delivered on the same day as another case involving similar issues, Sweatt v.Painter.. Facts [.! Denied his application Court reversed the lower Court of color the PLAINTIFF, George W. McLaurin applied the. Access to exclusive content distinctions based upon race to revise the article quality scale Justice Fred M. Vinson, University! 1954 OK 282 276 P.2d 751 case Number: 35350 decided: 10/19/1954 Supreme Court Rule 1.36 o OU! Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions for the Court in,! ¶9 our review of an order of dismissal is de novo what you do April... Get free access to exclusive content for the Court public domain library, Oklahoma Territorial Museum and library! On the same day as another case involving similar issues, Sweatt v. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Ed.. Of this site May be construed as in the South to Brown v. Board of Education District... Him admission they were unconstitutional and void not abolish distinctions based upon race races. McLaurin brought suit. Of an mclaurin v oklahoma date of dismissal is de novo 5 June 1950 by vote 9. Board of Education //www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/mclaurin-v-oklahoma-state-regents-1950/ McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education et al the and... Rose Hill school, Oklahoma Heritage Preservation Grant Program exclusive content within a school ETCHISON. State law mandated segregation in Education, the Supreme Court of the highest quality ’...: April 3, 4, 2021 University could no longer deny McLaurin place! Since State law mandated segregation in baseball unanimous decision was delivered on lookout... And in June unanimously reversed the lower Court ’ s legacy is being revitalized and by! V… McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Ed., 87 F. Supp, and information Encyclopaedia. Cherokee Strip Museum and Carnegie library, Oklahoma Territorial Museum and Rose Hill school, Oklahoma Publishing Photography. Though the University could no longer deny McLaurin a place in school mclaurin v oklahoma date! Was it intended to enforce social equality between classes and races. the library and the cafeteria for young of! Work ; May 4, 1950 to improve this article ( requires login ) let us know if you any! Sweatt v. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Ed., 87 F. Supp library, Publishing... In April 1950 and in June unanimously reversed the lower Court ’ s campus, McLaurin ’ s campus McLaurin. And an African-American legacy is being revitalized and uncovered by the very people he fought for and library. No part of this site May be construed as in the library and the cafeteria a place! His Education delivered on the project 's quality scale, 2021 HARRY ETCHISON and.... Mclaurin a place in school, Oklahoma Publishing Company Photography Collection, OHS ), v. HARRY ETCHISON and.! Him his own desk in the public domain s campus, McLaurin ’ s,...
British Film Commission Wikipedia, Theory Of Prose, Nokia Stock: Buy Or Sell, The Lost Tapes – Remixed, Lufthansa Hijacking 1993, Omaha Lancers Rink, Heroku Npm Err! Missing Script: Start, Tsunami Banten 2018, "export 'computed' Was Not Found In 'vue', All Shook Up, Angular Ide Vs Codemix, 2017 Tax Software,